Close Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
  • Competition
  • Home New
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sunday, July 6
Facebook X (Twitter)
MPNEWSMPNEWS
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Home New
Breaking News
MPNEWSMPNEWS
Home»News»Hope for Somers appeal from court ruling
News

Hope for Somers appeal from court ruling

By David HarrisonFebruary 22, 2016Updated:July 16, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
Not so peaceful: The quiet, leafy lanes of Somers appear an unlikely setting for the battle that’s being fought over Mornington Peninsula Shire’s plan for concrete footpaths, with ratepayers being billed for half the $1.5 million cost.
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

SHIRE officers are examining a Supreme Court decision that effectively excluded a third of properties from a footpath special charge scheme in Jan Juc because they would not get the required special benefit from the proposed path network.

The case could be relevant if the controversial Somers path scheme – which proposes charging properties up to two kilometres from the proposed $1.5 million concrete path – is taken to VCAT, as some Somers residents have threatened.

VCAT’s decision-making history could mean the Somers appellants could face a huge legal bill whether they won or lost at the tribunal. They could face an appeal to the Supreme Court if the shire won. Such an appeal can only be made on a point of law.

In the Jan Juc case, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal had originally decided in favour of Jan Juc residents. The Surf Coast Shire then appealed to the Supreme Court.

In a complex technical ruling the higher court found the shire had exceeded its jurisdiction and directed VCAT to revise its original decision. That resulted in 23 of 67 properties not having to pay for the path network.

Mornington Peninsula Shire’s chief operating officer Alison Leighton said the shire had for years maintained a watching brief on VCAT decisions concerning special charge schemes.

In the Jan Juc case, the initial VCAT decision “was set aside by the Supreme Court and the scheme was then modified by consent – by agreement between the applicants and council,” Ms Leighton said. “The final outcome was not a decision of VCAT per se but rather a negotiated outcome between the parties.”

She said it should be noted that VCAT is not a court that follows precedent. “We do review tribunal decisions and assess applicability to Mornington Peninsula Shire schemes,” she said.

Surf Coast Shire had in 2009 proposed a “walk-ability and bike-ability” path network for Jan Juc village, near Torquay. Of 974 submissions the shire received, 892 eligible property owners objected. A further 54 late opposing submissions were lodged. That left 28 property owners apparently favouring the scheme.

The following year an amended path scheme proposing a 40 per cent cut in the original plan was approved. The shire claimed all within the scheme got a special benefit, either direct or indirect.

The shire argued in VCAT in 2011 that community safety was a key issue in the path plan, which it said was a benefit to all it encompassed.

Tribunal Member Nicholas Hadjigeorgiou said it was incumbent on objectors to establish “that they receive no benefit at all from the proposed scheme” to avoid paying for it.

“This is distinct from showing a lesser or marginal benefit. Thus, the bar for this test, to show no benefit, is set relatively high,” he said.

Mr Hadjigeorgiou found that a number of objectors did receive no benefit.

“While I can understand the council’s wish to include as many properties as possible within the scheme to minimise the cost per property, the test must be that these properties will receive a ‘special benefit’,” he said.

He ruled that the scheme “must fail” because of the number who received no benefit.

In the Supreme Court’s Court of Appeal, Justice Emilios Kyrou ordered that VCAT re-hear the case. His main finding was that the VCAT decision could not authorise setting aside the entire special charge scheme.

Back at VCAT, responding to the Supreme Court direction, Member Hadjigeorgiou heard further submissions on who should be excluded from the scheme on the ground of no special benefit.

He said the parties had consulted during the hearing “and by consent identified a number of applicant properties that would receive no special benefit,” he stated.

He ordered that the special charge scheme be “varied accordingly” and dismissed the residents’ appeal.

The 23 excluded properties and their owners were specified in his decision.

First published in the Southern Peninsula News – 23 February 2016

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Advocates celebrate abuse law change

July 3, 2025

Railway station scam

July 1, 2025

Flinders result unaffected by poll blunder – AEC

July 1, 2025

Grand Hotel’s tower revamp signals new chapter for icon

June 26, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Peninsula Essence Magazine – Click to Read
Peninsula Kids Magazine – Click to Read
Letters to the Editor
Property of the Week

14 Bass Street, McCrae

June 3, 2025
Council Watch

Shire secures $3.9m to tackle road safety

June 16, 2025

Kinder flyer flag snub prompts councillors to take over

June 10, 2025
100 Years Ago This Week

Baxter – On The ‘Wallaby’ with a walking group

July 1, 2025
Interview

Firefighter shows skills from sea to snow

February 5, 2024
Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Home New
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook X (Twitter)
© 2025 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.