• Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
  • Competition
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Catch of the decade
  • Season on the line for Seagulls
  • Pythons face an uphill battle, Redlegs stumble
  • Ketch blown ashore in Dromana
  • Early morning hit
  • Boxing world mourns loss of a champion
  • Successfully navigating the path of anxiety
  • Ryman abandons Mt Martha centre
Facebook Twitter
MPNEWSMPNEWS
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
MPNEWSMPNEWS
Home»News»Moves to bring sand to Portsea
News

Moves to bring sand to Portsea

By Keith PlattMarch 7, 2016Updated:March 15, 2016No Comments3 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

PORTSEA BEACH SANDBAGS 04-03-2016 BY YANNI 13

CONTRACTORS are about to be appointed to investigate restoring Portsea’s famed front beach to its former, sand-filled glory.

Following years of arguing over the causes of the sand loss, the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning in February called for quotes on the methods and cost of replacing sand and preventing its future erosion.

Background notes provided by the department acknowledge swell waves from Bass Strait as causing Portsea’s sand loss, but does not mention channel deepening in 2008-09, the biggest and most recent change to the Port Phillip seabed.

The Port of Melbourne Corporation denied its two-year $720 million dredging project caused the erosion but two state government-commissioned reports – by Water Technologies and the CSIRO – revealed the removal of sand further out in the bay had changed the shape and power of waves hitting the beach.

Reports of abnormally large waves hitting the front beach were first made in late 2008.

The department has narrowed the remedies for the beach down to six and expects the successful contractor to assess their effectiveness “over a 50 year planning horizon, having a design life of not less than 20 years and not greater than 50 years”.

The six coastal and maritime options to be assessed are:

1. Shaping the seabed with dredging.

2. Building a breakwater seaward of Portsea pier.

3. Installing groynes or artificial headland on the beach east of the pier.

4. Replacing the existing sandbag seawall with a rock seawall.

5. Restoring or renourishing alone or in combination with 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, for example, beach renourishment and a seawall

6. Removing the sandbag seawall to examine beach dynamics, recovery and/or erosion.

The department also specifies which models or computer simulations must be used by contractor when assessing the six remedial options.

The contractor must also predict “potential environmental impacts” of the options on Portsea front beach, in Weeroona Bay and “to the surrounding near shore and down-drift coastline”.

The “transparent and justifiable” costs of the project can have a 30 per cent plus or minus margin for error.

Most of the beach was washed away in 2010 and the government then spent about $3 million to replace lost sand and protect the beach with sandbags and rocks.

The authorities had repeatedly said the beach was destroyed by natural causes such as storms, higher sea levels and natural erosion (“Rocks for Portsea beach”, The News, 8/8/13).

Water Technologies’ report stated channel deepening had created channels that allowed larger and more powerful waves to sweep into the beach.

The CSIRO report stated a change in the local wave conditions was the likely cause of the erosion at Portsea but this could not be measured accurately due to a lack of “long wave records at Portsea beach that pre-date the erosion event and CDP [channel deepening project]”.

It is understood the department’s 17-page tender document was sent to four potential contractors as well the Nepean Ratepayers’ Association.

First published in the Southern Peninsula News – 8 March 2016

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Early morning hit

August 8, 2022

Ryman abandons Mt Martha centre

August 8, 2022

Saving on power costs

August 8, 2022

Opportunites for baristas

August 1, 2022
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Weather
Aug 9, 2022 - Tue
Mornington, Australia
7°C
clear sky
clear sky
3 m/s, E
72%
769.57 mmHg
tue08/09 wed08/10 thu08/11 fri08/12 sat08/13
sky is clear
10/7°C
overcast clouds
11/10°C
moderate rain
11/11°C
light rain
14/12°C
light rain
12/9°C
Peninsula Essence Magazine

Click here to read

July 25, 2022
Peninsula Kids Magazine

Click here to read

May 26, 2022
Council Watch

Shire ‘committed’ to aged care

August 8, 2022

Shire not forced to drop aged care services

August 1, 2022
State Elections 2022

‘Justice’ for animals and climate

August 8, 2022

Peta Murphy wins second term in Dunkley

May 23, 2022

Shire accused of being off track with pledges

May 17, 2022
Interview

All aboard for murder mystery

July 25, 2022
Property of the Week

14 Lynch Court, Mt Martha

July 26, 2022
100 Years Ago This Week

Ketch blown ashore in Dromana

August 8, 2022
Contact
Street: 63 Watt Road, Mornington, 3931
Mailing: PO Box 588, Hastings, 3915
Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook Twitter
© 2022 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.