Close Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
  • Competition
  • Home New
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Tuesday, July 1
Breaking News
  • E-bike rider charged following fatal collision in Hastings
Facebook X (Twitter)
MPNEWSMPNEWS
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Home New
Breaking News
MPNEWSMPNEWS
Home»News»Case builds against 50m pool
News

Case builds against 50m pool

By Stephen TaylorFebruary 26, 2018Updated:July 16, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Mornington Peninsula Shire is being accused of ignoring the business case for an alternative “more sensible” 25-metre pool at Rosebud.

Retired businessman Colin Watson says building a 50-metre pool will be a waste of shire money while Mornington Peninsula Ratepayers’ Association secretary Dr Alan Nelsen sees a larger pool as being “over the top”.

Shoreham Community Association says money being earmarked for the larger pool are jeopardising its entire 2018-19 budget submissions.

Mr Watson, a Portsea resident, said the business case supporting a 25-metre pool by consultants GHD Pty Ltd “could not be clearer that a 50-metre pool would be a substantial over-investment and a waste of precious capital resources and become a recurrent financial burden for many generations to come”.

Mr Watson backs Rosebud as the site for a new pool, but not one so big.

Dr Nelsen agrees, saying a 10-lane, 50-metre pool is over the top: “You do not need to be a rocket scientist to work out that Rosebud does not need a pool of that size.

“Over the past decade the council has spent about $10 million on consultants’ reports, shire overheads, and buying the now-dud Rosebud central shopping centre site for the pool, and still no progress.

“Only three months after asking the community to have its say the council [has] decided to hold another survey and repeat the same question: a 25-metre pool or a massive 10-lane, 50-metre pool? However, in this instance all that will be measured is how organised and successful the pro-50 metre pool lobby group is at getting people to respond, compared to those who simply don’t bother. It will not be a true or valid measure of the community’s opinion.”

Shoreham Community Association president Alan Fisher said his group’s 2018-19 submissions – and many other submissions from Red Hill Ward – were being pushed aside because the larger pool was “taking all available shire funds”.

“We wish to make a very strong protest of this blatant disregard of our part of the shire,” Mr Fisher stated in a letter to council.

“If modest funding requests … are being disregarded [for] a 50 metre indoor pool at Rosebud which will have no value to the majority of ratepayers in Shoreham and the wider Red Hill Ward, then … we provide a strong vote of disapproval of the pool project which we believe should be paired back to a 25-metre pool.”

Dr Nelson said a larger pool would be the same size as that built for the Commonwealth Games at Albert Park and Frankston Council’s Peninsula Aquatic Recreation Centre. “This is despite the council insisting for 15 years that a 25-metre pool is adequate, a number of independent consultants’ reports and the business case … saying that spending the extra $7.62 million for a 10 lane, 50-metre pool, is a waste of money.”

Mr Watson said the larger pool would need a catchment area of at least 100,000 residents to justify it while Rosebud’s target catchment was 57,000.

First published in the Southern Peninsula News – 27 February 2018

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Flinders result unaffected by poll blunder – AEC

July 1, 2025

Grand Hotel’s tower revamp signals new chapter for icon

June 26, 2025

McCrae telco tower refused over visual impact

June 26, 2025

Future on the line for cramped Men’s Shed

June 25, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Peninsula Essence Magazine – Click to Read
Peninsula Kids Magazine – Click to Read
Letters to the Editor
Property of the Week

14 Bass Street, McCrae

June 3, 2025
Council Watch

Shire secures $3.9m to tackle road safety

June 16, 2025

Kinder flyer flag snub prompts councillors to take over

June 10, 2025
100 Years Ago This Week

Electrification of Trains – Frankston to Mornington Line

June 23, 2025
Interview

Firefighter shows skills from sea to snow

February 5, 2024
Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Home New
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook X (Twitter)
© 2025 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.