UNION lawyers were last week looking over documents to be lodged with the Fair Work Commission following a breakdown in negotiations aimed at saving the jobs of rangers and their supervisors at Mornington Peninsula Shire.
Australian Services Union organiser Ty Lockwood said the shire was offering redundancy packages to 13 employees in its compliance unit who had been told they could then reapply for their jobs (“Union moves to protect jobs at shire” The News 3/4/18).
He said the shire could face a $1 million payout.
“We want a Fair Work hearing – conciliation is the first part – as I’ve been to see them [shire managers] three times without a result.
“We believe there’s a genuine difference with what’s set out in the enterprise agreement. What they’re saying doesn’t match with what they’re doing.”
Mr Lockwood said positions could only be declared redundant if the work was no longer required by an employer.
In this case, the new positions being advertised stipulated the same work as the existing jobs “with some extras, such as writing briefs”.
“There are 13 or 14 brand new positions which are essentially equivalent to those they’ve axed,” Mr Lockwood said on Thursday. “We call it spill and fill.”
He said there was no reason why existing officers could not be taught the extra skills.
While at the shire last week Mr Lockwood had also raised the question of school crossing supervisors being made authorised officers, enabling them to book motorists for traffic offences.
“They told me they had no intent of doing that, but I think we just caught them in time,” he said.
Mr Lockwood believed a training session before the end of the school holidays had been hurriedly cancelled by the shire.
“This [giving crossing supervisors power to book motorists] would have huge safety implications,” he said.
“Imagine, there would be confrontations between supervisors and motorists and who would assist children and families to cross the road?
“Common sense says this idea is just fraught with danger and puts the public and the crossing supervisor in potentially very dangerous and confrontational situations.
“I personally have no reasonable idea why the shire would go down this path other than an attempt to gain more revenue through issuing infringements in and around school zones.
“No other council or shire in Victoria has ever attempted such an outrageous idea.
“This would have been a strange thing to have done and the only benefit could be revenue.”
Mr Lockwood said school crossing supervisors were on the lowest of eight pay levels “and you should only authorise high level officers” who are involved in governance or deal with legislation or the administration of government acts.
The shire did not respond to questions about the school crossing supervisors by deadline.