• Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Read Our Newspapers Online
    • Read the Latest Western Port News
    • Read the Latest Mornington News
    • Read the Latest Southern Peninsula News
    • Read the Latest Frankston Times
    • Read the Latest Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Teen arrested following Capel Sound attempted armed robbery
  • Car show supports young patients
  • Fatal collision in Somerville
  • Sharks get their bite back
  • Kangaroos and Demons continue undefeated starts
  • Mornington, Pines still top dogs
  • Kah finds the key to La Mexicana’s best
  • Train mounts platform in Seaford accident
Facebook Twitter
MPNEWS MPNEWS
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
MPNEWS MPNEWS
Home»Council Watch»CEO’s powers up, councillors down in suggested ‘best practice’ option
Council Watch

CEO’s powers up, councillors down in suggested ‘best practice’ option

By MP News GroupMarch 1, 2021Updated:March 2, 2021No Comments3 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
By Hugh Fraser*

MORNINGTON Peninsula Shire CEO John Baker has been quick to propose to the new council – with eight new councillors out of 11 – radical changes to meeting procedures that substantially enhance a CEO’s powers while reducing council’s ability to regulate its own procedure.

Touted as “best practice”, these management-proposed rules are not.

Council needs to be zealous in guarding the representative democratic rights of the community to our third tier of (local) government as transparent, community engaged and able to extract accountability from management.

As recently as 2018, councillors revised their meeting procedure rules. Over the course of several workshops, councillors carefully worked through the rules with management and legal advice.

A satisfactory set of rules – indeed described as “model” rules by council’s legal adviser – was approved and soundly operates today.

Two revised rules provide for the continuation of limiting a CEO’s powers to reject a councillor’s notice of motion, and a three-day period of notice was extended to five days. This enabled a substantive management response before the meeting.

An unlawful or unfair rejection of a councillor’s notice of motion by a CEO can be remedied as a matter of “urgent business” at a later meeting.

Further, if a notice of motion is rejected by a CEO, a councillor can revise it with management assistance and resubmit it.

A notice of motion to revoke a council resolution previously made requires but one signature. This right is sparingly used in this council and usually only exercised, as it was recently, where the factual or information basis on which it was made was inadequate or unsound.

Further, a CEO has no power to directly address councillors during debate but may do so before debate starts. Once a debate is under way, the matter is solely in the hands of elected councillors.

However, the proposed rules would expand a CEO’s power to reject notices of motion, require 10, not five, business days’ notice, and bind council with a CEO’s advice as to what constitutes “urgent business”.

A notice of motion to revoke an adopted resolution would require the signatures of three councillors, including one of a councillor who supported the earlier resolution.

I don’t think this is best practice. It is a “one-off” rule copied by the shire’s management from Frankston Council’s rules. At Frankston, it was adopted to remedy a specific dysfunctional use of meetings procedure, which the peninsula does not share.

More importantly, a CEO, or his delegate, would be given an unprecedented power to address the meeting to correct a “factual” error during councillors’ debate.

Such a power invites a CEO, or his delegate, to intervene in the debate as a notional 12th councillor. This is anathema.

The community and experienced councillors readily understand the difficulties this will cause and rightly reject these proposed meeting procedure rules as being undemocratic.

*Hugh Fraser is a Mornington Peninsula Shire councillor for Nepean Ward.

First published in the Southern Peninsula News – 2 March 2021

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

‘Providers’ sought to take over shire’s home day care

April 19, 2021

Susan Bissinger set for council seat after recount

April 13, 2021

Brown coal to hydrogen: responsible or risky?

April 12, 2021

Grant offer to cut single-use plastics

April 12, 2021
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Weather
Apr 22, 2021 - Thu
Mornington, Australia
14°C
overcast clouds
overcast clouds
1 m/s, WSW
81%
759.81 mmHg
thu04/22 fri04/23 sat04/24 sun04/25 mon04/26
light rain
14/14°C
light rain
14/14°C
light rain
16/13°C
light rain
15/14°C
light rain
14/15°C
Peninsula Essence Magazine

Click here to read

March 29, 2021
Peninsula Kids Magazine

Click here to read

February 25, 2021
Property of the Week

Horizon sets new goal for property prices

January 11, 2021
Council Watch

‘Providers’ sought to take over shire’s home day care

April 19, 2021

Susan Bissinger set for council seat after recount

April 13, 2021
Interview

Moment of madness, but no end to family’s pain

April 19, 2021
Contact
Street: 63 Watt Road, Mornington, 3931
Mailing: PO Box 588, Hastings, 3915
Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Local History
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
About

Established in 2006, Mornington Peninsula News Group (MPNG) is a locally owned and operated, independent media company.

MPNG publishes five weekly community newspapers: the Western Port News, Mornington News, Southern Peninsula News, Frankston Times and Chelsea Mordialloc Mentone News.

MPNG also publishes two glossy magazines: Peninsula Essence and Peninsula Kids.

Facebook Twitter
© 2021 Mornington Peninsula News Group.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.